Get access to all the tools and information necessary for the customer's life cycle at Odigo by heading to our client portal
In today’s highly competitive world, organizations strive to distinguish their brand through espousing corporate values, developing innovative technology and providing answers to previously thought unsolvable problems. But the real differentiator between thriving and struggling companies is as old as the very concept of business ¬¬– customer satisfaction (CSAT). Contact center directors understand that rethinking the way their contact center operate so the focus is on customer satisfaction is vital to generating growth and enhancing brand reputation.
Across all sectors, call center managers know a good way to measure CSAT is simply to ask customers for their opinions. While valuable in isolated evaluations, the results of these surveys also provide key insight into the broader customer experience (CX).
Forrester explains it succinctly: CX is an engine of growth. Specifically, the latest research reveals that translating CX measures into specific investments drives revenue performance and that “brands that excel in CX increase revenue at twice the rate of brands that don’t.” This explains why, according to Gartner, 74% of organizations expect increases in their CX budgets in 2020.
While there are various CSAT measurement strategies and multiple call center indicators to consider – including customer effort score (CES), there are two that dominate the current landscape. At the corporate level, the most highly regarded customer satisfaction benchmark is the net promoter score (NPS). As explained by Forbes, this is a simple question, first developed by Fred Reicheld and Bain & Company, which asks participants to rank on a scale of zero to 10 the likelihood of recommending a company to a friend or colleague.
There are a number of benefits of this methodology; from simplicity in execution to low cost of administration. However, foremost is the ease and rapidity with which customers can convey their opinion. Moreover, Forbes details a proven link between high NPS scores and strong customer loyalty, so the accuracy of results can be trusted.
The benefits of NPS scoring do not mean there are not notable drawbacks to this way of measuring CSAT. While it assuredly drives efforts to improve call center services and a brand’s products, NPS remains so vague that it is difficult to understand what exactly in the service or product provided needs improvement. As such, it is a great indicator of overall experiences with a brand, but less so when it comes to specific interactions. Additionally, NPS only reflects the team aspect of an organization, not individual members, so it is difficult to pinpoint who is excelling in customer service and who needs more training and support…
On the delivery side, annual customer satisfaction surveys are more common, as they dig deeper into CSAT issues and seek to discover the finer details of what works well and what could be improved. Here, the background information, broader context and factoring in of extenuating circumstances provide a clearer, more targeted view of individualized evaluations. Typically, annual customer satisfaction surveys are carried out on an annual basis for every account, though depending on the scope of a project or the size of the account, this could be a quarterly or monthly review.
Annual customer satisfaction surveys can identify issues and raise awareness about concerns before they become seriously detrimental. This is especially true for call centers, where accessibility to support and efficiency of operations are frequently areas that can fall short of customers’ expectations.
Only by possessing concrete information on CSAT results, whether NPS, annual customer satisfaction surveys or other measurements, can an organization understand the situation and implement changes to improve its call center’s CX.
Before acting on results with regards to contact center performances, careful consideration must be given as to the nature of the results expected, that is, understanding what is being measured and why. The process of achieving contact center excellence necessitates questioning customers, analyzing their feedback and implementing appropriate adjustments at the service and operation levels. Having reactive processes, people and tools in place is important, but regular service evaluations and exchanges are key. Obviously, such discussions may result in modifying criteria for call center CSAT, whether it be related to evaluating IVR flows, dropped calls, etc.
While NPS and annual customer satisfaction surveys provide valuable insights into customer satisfaction, conducting regular or intermittent quality assurance reviews is yet another means of ‘keeping the finger on the CSAT pulse’. Results obtained through these reviews, which also measure strengths and weaknesses in customer service,must be scrupulously analyzed and based on this analysis; an action plan should be formed. Ideally, this is a mutually designed initiative in which both parties, client and contact center solution provider, engage in. Crucially, action plans must include specific dates and barometers, this is the only way to demonstrate proficiency, gain clients’ trust and build strong relationships.
Being committed to B2C CSAT is more than just providing tools (AI-driven or other) to call centers that aid in collecting, measuring and collocating customer satisfaction feedback. Implementation and run stages of the contact center are important, but end stages also demand committed support. Proactive, agile end to end engagement will encourage cooperative teamwork based on a mutual understanding of goals and foster a real partnership between the client and those in charge of managing the contact center solution.
The challenges of modern customer service require a practical, yet forward-thinking vision embraced by all departments. This means reactive professional service teams should focus on the quality of delivery, consulting teams should strive to be proactive and dedicated operations teams should concentrate on quality and availability.
Are you a contact center manager looking to boost customer satisfaction while enabling rewarding agent experiences (AX)? Find out why organizations turn to Odigo, a global Contact Center as a Service (CCaaS) solutions provider recognized as a leader in CSAT by Markess, a leading French digital research institute, in their 2020 Vendor Score Index® (VSI). Get in touch by clicking here.
The role of supervisor directly impacts contact center agent experience. The tools that are available to supervisors impact how they can perform that role. High-performing agent supervision tools must be capable of supporting supervisors by letting them organize metrics visually for quick action, as well as assisting agents working remotely. Aurore Carrie explains it all.
Contact centers strive to be accessible via as many channels as possible in order to meet growing customer preferences. Rich communication services (RCS) is sure to get a large piece of this pie because they are based on text messaging which is the mainstay of billions of mobile phone users, with 1.2 billion worldwide already being only a click away from having RCS-supported devices. What’s in store for contact centers?
In Western Europe, the public sector occupies a special place in the customer relations landscape. Public sector services, country to country, have varying levels of maturity and therefore, different user experiences. These differences not only have a significant impact on the type of technological solutions needed to properly manage user relations, but also on the specific stakes of the public services: the volume and complexity of interactions, the weight of political power, data security, accessibility and the quality of the customer relationship. How can Contact Center as a Service (CCaaS) solutions meet the challenges of public services?