Get access to all the tools and information necessary for the customer's life cycle at Odigo by heading to our client portal
Equipped with unique personalities, chatbots use speech and playful content to entice with their conversation and instill a sense of comradery with consumers won over by self-service… at least in theory! Today, the time has come to confront promises with reality.
For almost 3 years, the excitement around chatbots has not subsided! It is predicted that these self-learning, available 24 hours a day, virtual agents will automate up to 85% of agents’ tasks by 2030. Equipped with unique personalities, chatbots use speech and playful content to entice with their conversation and instill a sense of comradery with consumers won over by self-service… at least in theory! Today, the time has come to confront promises with reality. So, what kind of ROI do you get with chatbots?
A majority of companies consider conversational agents a lever for their digital transformation, at least that is what numerous studies claim. These same studies also agree that the massive adoption of bots is still far from being achieved. And when companies integrate a chatbot – sometimes on their website, often on their Facebook page – it rarely meets their expectations or those of their users.
Many chatbots haven’t been able to bluff by the relevance of their answers nor the richness of their conversation. Although always available, these conversational agents are far from systematic at providing immediate and useful answers. At the risk of disappointing the early adopters of these innovative solutions, the first negative experience can be fatal to the adoption of a new service.
Why hasn’t the chatbot always kept his promises? Part of the answer lies in the fantasies often associated with machine learning (ML). Indeed, this idea of automatic learning led some companies to think that the chatbot would be able to learn everything by itself. However, the reality is quite different.
A conversational agent does not think. Even if chatbots are complex programs that apply man-made decision rules and must be trained to recognize “situations“. They simply apply a conversation scenario that responds to the recognition of intentions – through automatic speech recognition (ASR) or natural language understanding (NLU) – or reacts according to the user’s choices (through choice buttons or in a carousel for example).
A conversational agent is defined by its ability to let the user express himself freely, and then to respond to his requests as naturally as possible and in a relevant manner. Reaching this Holy Grail (responding in relation to the user’s personal problem) requires taking the time to properly train your language recognition engine. In this respect, the most effective way remains to “feed the bot” with as many sentences representative of how users formulate their requests as possible. This step is crucial to the adoption of the chatbot from its first interactions and remains necessary as the services provided by the bot evolve. These learning phases have often been underestimated or even hidden from companies blinded by the promises of “self-machine-learning.”
It’s not all bleak. A number of successes have been achieved, especially in terms of the personality of the chatbots, who can be distinguished by their way of expressing themselves, their tonality (institutional or lighter), their vocabulary, or their appearance and color.
Nonetheless, however singular it may be, personality is not enough to compensate for ignorance. And even if significant progress has been made to reach a satisfactory level of understanding for users, without relevant content to offer and personalized answers, the chatbot is close to being an unnecessary gadget.
To overcome the last challenge – to provide a personalized service – the chatbot must be able to access all the company’s knowledge (its information system (IS), customer relationship management (CRM), and knowledge base). But this knowledge still needs to be both structured and accessible. This is an essential step if we want to offer more autonomy and useful self-service to customers on the one hand and relieve human agents of the requests that can be met without them on the other! But be aware, the complexity and budget associated with integration have sometimes been presented in a watered-down way by some vendors, notably pure players.
However, the chatbot is still far from having said his last word, and we will see why in the second part of this blog post. We will also explain how to create a conversational agent that is more than just a gadget. Finally, we will come back in detail on the different ways to efficiently measure the ROI of a chatbot.
In just a few short years, the logic behind Black Friday contact center preparations has changed. Due to recent developments in the customer service industry and the world at large, simply onboarding more agents just doesn’t make sense like it used to for high traffic periods. Instead, a technology-based approach to managing high call volumes across your customer service channels aligns with important metrics.
There are hard and soft costs associated with contact center turnover, the rates of which have been rising in recent years. Focusing on agent-centric issues, such as empathy fatigue, could help you stem the tide of agent attrition. Read on to find out how to ease burnout, turnover and further costs.
Contact center agents want to learn the craft of customer service, gain new skills and develop professionally. If they aren’t improving, then they’re moving. Upgrading your contact center’s technology will give agents the chance to upgrade their portfolio of skills while also minimizing stress and maximizing engagement from customers and agents alike.